Ghada Ismail

Finding the right investment opportunity is a crucial step toward achieving strong returns. Before investors evaluate valuations, conduct due diligence, or negotiate terms, they must identify businesses and assets that fit their objectives. This process, known as deal sourcing, plays a central role in private equity, venture capital, and mergers and acquisitions (M&A).

What Is Deal Sourcing?

Deal sourcing is the process of identifying and establishing contact with potential investment opportunities. These may include startups seeking funding, established businesses looking for investors, or companies available for acquisition.

Investors use market research, professional networks, referrals, direct outreach, and financial intermediaries to build a pipeline of potential deals. Effective sourcing focuses not only on finding opportunities but also on identifying businesses that match an investor’s sector preferences, budget, risk tolerance, and expected returns.

Two common approaches are proprietary and intermediated deal sourcing.

What Is Proprietary Deal Sourcing?

Proprietary deal sourcing involves identifying opportunities through an investor’s own research, relationships, and direct outreach rather than relying primarily on formal intermediaries or widely marketed transactions.

For example, a private equity firm may approach a business owner directly to explore an acquisition before the company is formally put up for sale. Investors can develop such opportunities through industry events, founder networks, referrals, and targeted research.

The main advantage is the potential for less competition, giving investors more time to build relationships and negotiate terms. Early engagement can also help investors understand a business before a formal transaction begins.

However, proprietary sourcing requires considerable time, research, and relationship-building. It does not guarantee exclusivity, lower valuations, or a successful transaction.

What Is Intermediated Deal Sourcing?

Intermediated deal sourcing involves accessing investment opportunities through third parties, such as investment banks, M&A advisers, business brokers, and other professional networks.

For example, a company planning to sell may appoint an investment bank to identify potential buyers and coordinate the bidding process. Interested investors receive information about the business and can assess whether it fits their investment strategy.

This approach can provide access to a broader range of opportunities and streamline the initial screening process. However, competitive bidding may push valuations higher, while intermediary fees can increase transaction costs. Investors may also face tighter timelines when evaluating deals.

Proprietary vs. Intermediated Deal Sourcing

The key difference lies in how investors access opportunities and the level of competition involved.

Proprietary sourcing emphasizes direct relationships and targeted outreach. It may provide earlier access and less competition but requires sustained effort to build a reliable pipeline.

Intermediated sourcing uses established professional channels to connect investors with potential transactions. It can improve access to available deals and simplify the sourcing process, although competition and fees may be higher.

Neither approach guarantees better investment outcomes. Success ultimately depends on the quality of the opportunity, due diligence, valuation, and negotiated terms.

Which Strategy Is Better?

For many investors, combining both approaches offers the greatest flexibility. Proprietary sourcing helps uncover opportunities and establish long-term relationships, while intermediated sourcing provides access to businesses already seeking investment or considering a sale.

The right balance depends on the investor’s objectives, resources, target market, and investment stage. Ultimately, successful deal sourcing is not about finding the most opportunities, but about identifying the right investments and building relationships that lead to sustainable value creation.

Kholoud Hussein

Saudi Arabia’s artificial intelligence ambitions are entering a new phase, with HUMAIN moving beyond its initial role as a state-backed AI infrastructure developer to build a broader business spanning data centers, computing capacity, Arabic-language models, enterprise software, strategic investments, and physical AI applications.

Since its launch by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) in May 2025, HUMAIN has assembled partnerships with some of the world’s largest technology companies, including NVIDIA, AMD, Cisco, Qualcomm, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Mistral AI. It has also expanded its relationship with Elon Musk’s xAI, invested $3 billion in the company, and announced plans to develop large-scale computing infrastructure in Saudi Arabia.

The scale of its ambitions has increased sharply. In an interview published in October 2026, HUMAIN CEO Tareq Amin said the company was targeting 1.7 gigawatts (GW) of data center capacity in 2027, around 3 GW by 2030, and approximately 6 GW by 2034. The targets place HUMAIN at the center of Saudi Arabia’s effort to become a major global destination for AI computing. 

Yet the company’s long-term value will depend on more than the amount of computing power it can install. HUMAIN must also secure financing, convert infrastructure into contracted demand, develop commercially competitive AI products, attract technical talent, and help Saudi businesses adopt AI at scale. Its strategy reflects a broader economic question facing the Kingdom: how to turn substantial investment in technology infrastructure into a durable source of productivity, intellectual property, and non-oil growth.

From national AI platform to global technology business

HUMAIN was established to operate across the AI value chain, rather than concentrate on a single product or service. Its mandate encompasses next-generation data centers, high-performance computing and cloud platforms, advanced AI models, and AI-powered applications for businesses and government entities.

The company’s creation reflects the PIF’s wider strategy of investing in industries that can diversify the Saudi economy, attract international capital, and build domestic technological capabilities. It also brings AI infrastructure and software development into a coordinated commercial structure, linking the Kingdom’s energy resources and investment capacity with global semiconductor suppliers, cloud providers, and model developers. 

This approach addresses a structural challenge in the AI market. Building advanced models requires substantial computing resources, specialized chips, reliable power, and high-speed networking. Operating them commercially also requires cloud platforms, software, enterprise integration, and customers willing to pay for the resulting services.

HUMAIN is attempting to connect these layers within one business. Its partnerships provide access to technology and expertise that would be difficult to reproduce independently in the short term, while its Saudi operations are intended to establish a local base for computing, model development, and commercial deployment.

The strategy is not limited to serving Saudi government agencies. HUMAIN has repeatedly positioned the Kingdom as a potential exporter of AI computing and services, serving regional and international customers from infrastructure located in Saudi Arabia. The opportunity rests partly on the country’s access to energy, land, capital, and connectivity, as well as its ambition to develop locally relevant AI products. 

The latest deals: Infrastructure, models, and real-world applications

HUMAIN’s recent announcements show how its strategy is expanding from building computing capacity toward attracting customers, developing products, and investing in technologies with global markets.

One of the most significant developments came on August 31, 2026, when HUMAIN, AMD, and Cisco announced that AI computing infrastructure powered by AMD Instinct MI355X GPUs, AMD EPYC CPUs, and Cisco Silicon One networking was live in Saudi Arabia and serving customers.

The companies also outlined plans to deploy up to 250 megawatts (MW) of additional AI infrastructure in the next phase, beginning in 2027. Their joint venture remains on track to deploy up to 1 GW of AI infrastructure by 2030, according to the announcement. 

The commercial significance is that HUMAIN is beginning to demonstrate operational computing services rather than relying solely on future capacity announcements. Production workloads can help establish whether its infrastructure meets customer requirements for performance, availability, and cost. They can also generate demand data that informs subsequent investment decisions.

Another major development involves DataVolt, a Saudi-based developer and operator of sustainable digital infrastructure. On August 31, the companies announced an expanded partnership to develop 100 MW of an AI-ready data center project at Oxagon, NEOM’s industrial city, as part of a 360 MW first phase of DataVolt’s planned campus. Construction was reported to be underway. 

The project illustrates the importance of partnerships in delivering AI infrastructure. Data center development requires land, power connections, cooling systems, construction expertise, and specialized equipment, in addition to computing hardware. Sharing responsibilities across infrastructure and technology partners can help distribute the cost and execution risks of a capital-intensive buildout.

HUMAIN is also pursuing partnerships that connect infrastructure with the software layer. In August 2026, Microsoft and HUMAIN announced the first milestone in a long-term strategic collaboration focused on bringing HUMAIN’s ALLAM models into Microsoft’s AI ecosystem, including Microsoft Foundry and the Microsoft 365 Copilot ecosystem. The collaboration also envisages joint work between HUMAIN specialists and Microsoft’s Forward Deployed Engineers to identify and deploy AI solutions for organizations. 

The arrangement could help HUMAIN reach enterprise customers through an established global software ecosystem. It also highlights a commercial challenge: developing an AI model is only one part of building a sustainable business. Models must be integrated into workflows, connected to organizational data, secured, and adapted to the needs of individual customers.

A further partnership with French AI developer Mistral AI, announced on August 24, 2026, focuses on infrastructure, advanced model development, and AI deployment in Saudi Arabia and the wider region. Initial areas of interest include cybersecurity and voice applications, alongside the development and localization of advanced models with strong Arabic-language performance. The companies described the collaboration as involving hundreds of millions of euros and said Mistral would explore using HUMAIN’s data center infrastructure. 

These partnerships serve different purposes. AMD and Cisco support computing infrastructure; DataVolt supports data center development; Microsoft provides a route into enterprise software; and Mistral brings model-development capabilities. Together, they suggest that HUMAIN is seeking to build a connected commercial ecosystem rather than a collection of isolated technology projects.

The $3 billion xAI investment and HUMAIN’s global ambitions

HUMAIN’s investment strategy extends beyond infrastructure partnerships. In February 2026, the company announced a $3 billion investment in xAI’s Series E financing round, becoming a significant minority shareholder. Following xAI’s acquisition by SpaceX, HUMAIN’s holdings were converted into SpaceX shares, according to the company’s announcement. 

The investment builds on an earlier agreement between HUMAIN and xAI to develop more than 500 MW of AI data center capacity in Saudi Arabia and deploy Grok across the Kingdom. The partnership links access to advanced AI models with the development of domestic computing infrastructure. 

The $3 billion investment is particularly notable because it demonstrates that HUMAIN is prepared to deploy capital into international AI platforms, not just Saudi-based assets. It could provide financial exposure to the growth of a major technology business while strengthening the relationship between HUMAIN and a partner involved in advanced AI models and large-scale computing.

However, the transaction should be distinguished from direct investment in Saudi infrastructure. An equity investment in a global technology company does not automatically create domestic computing capacity, jobs, or technology transfer. Those benefits depend on the associated commercial arrangements, local operations, and the extent to which the partnership creates opportunities for Saudi engineers and businesses.

HUMAIN has also been expanding its investment plans. In September 2026, Semafor reported that Amin intended to launch a large global venture capital fund, potentially larger than a previously contemplated $10 billion vehicle. According to the report, the fund would have offices in Saudi Arabia, the United States, France, and the United Kingdom. Amin told the publication: “We don’t do passive investments; that will never happen.” 

The reported fund would focus on investments that contribute to HUMAIN’s strategic objectives, including companies willing to use Saudi data centers for some of their computing operations or bring staff to the Kingdom. If implemented on the scale reported, this could give HUMAIN a role in shaping where AI companies locate their computing workloads, technical teams, and commercial activities.

The fund remains a reported plan rather than a confirmed, fully capitalized investment vehicle. Its eventual size, investment mandate, and launch timetable will be important indicators of whether HUMAIN intends to become a major global AI investor alongside its infrastructure and software businesses.

Data centers: The backbone of HUMAIN’s expansion

Data centers sit at the center of HUMAIN’s business model because advanced AI requires large amounts of computing power. Training sophisticated models, operating generative AI applications, and serving large numbers of users all depend on access to specialized processors and the infrastructure needed to operate them reliably.

Saudi Arabia has been expanding its broader digital infrastructure base. According to the Saudi Press Agency, operational data center capacity rose from 68 MW in 2021 to more than 440 MW in 2025, while the Kingdom hosted more than 60 data centers developed by over 20 companies, with investments exceeding SAR16 billion. 

HUMAIN’s targets would represent a substantial expansion beyond that existing market. Its October 2026 target of 1.7 GW in 2027, followed by approximately 3 GW by 2030 and 6 GW by 2034, would require a combination of new facilities, computing hardware, power infrastructure, cooling systems, networking, and long-term customer demand. 

The cost implications are considerable. EnterpriseAM reported that Amin estimated AI data center capacity typically costs between $10 million and $12 million per MW. Applying that benchmark to 1.45 GW of additional capacity—the difference between 250 MW and a 1.7 GW target—would imply roughly $14.5 billion to $17.4 billion in infrastructure costs. This is an illustrative calculation, not a company-announced budget; actual costs would depend on project scope, equipment, financing, and what is included in the capacity target. 

The company has already taken steps to establish financing channels. In January 2026, HUMAIN and Saudi Arabia’s National Infrastructure Fund (Infra) announced a strategic financing framework of up to $1.2 billion to support AI and digital infrastructure projects. The non-binding framework covers the development of up to 250 MW of hyperscale AI data center capacity. The parties also agreed to explore an AI data center investment platform designed to facilitate participation by domestic and international institutional investors. 

Separately, Bloomberg reported in September 2026 that HUMAIN was exploring raising an initial $2.5 billion from global and domestic investors for a data center fund. The reported fund would support a 250 MW project being developed with Al Moammar Information Systems and could eventually expand its capacity. This remains a reported financing plan, distinct from the Infra framework. 

The financing challenge is therefore not simply how much capital HUMAIN can attract, but how it structures that capital across projects with different risk profiles. Equity, debt, institutional investment, joint ventures, and long-term customer contracts can all play a role. The critical factor will be whether projected demand and operating revenue justify the cost of building capacity at the pace the company has outlined.

The energy advantage—and the infrastructure constraints

Saudi Arabia’s energy resources are central to its proposition as a global AI computing destination. Data centers require reliable electricity around the clock, and AI workloads can create particularly high power and cooling requirements. The availability and cost of electricity can therefore influence the competitiveness of a data center as directly as its computing hardware.

In an interview published in October 2026, Amin described HUMAIN’s network of AI campuses as spanning approximately 65 square kilometers and backed by 14 GW of grid capacity. He argued that the Kingdom’s combination of energy, land, connectivity, and the ability to deploy infrastructure at scale gives it a competitive advantage. 

But available power capacity is not the same as operational data center capacity. Facilities must secure grid connections, cooling, networking, permits, equipment, and construction schedules. They must also be designed to maintain service reliability as workloads and hardware requirements evolve.

The economic opportunity extends beyond hosting servers. Building a domestic AI infrastructure industry can create demand for engineering, construction, cooling, power management, cybersecurity, and equipment maintenance. The PIF’s HUMAIN portfolio page also identifies local manufacturing opportunities in data center cooling equipment, power equipment, and server racks. 

Localizing these supply chains could help retain more of the economic value generated by infrastructure investment. Without that development, a large share of the expenditure could flow to international hardware and technology suppliers, leaving Saudi Arabia primarily as the location where the equipment operates.

HUMAIN will therefore need to balance rapid deployment with efforts to develop domestic suppliers, technical capabilities, and more efficient operations. Energy availability is a competitive advantage, but converting it into a lasting industrial advantage requires more than access to electricity.

Closing gaps in Arabic AI, sovereign computing, and enterprise adoption

HUMAIN’s ambitions are not limited to data centers. Its model strategy addresses another gap: the need for advanced AI systems that perform well in Arabic and reflect the language’s linguistic, cultural, and commercial context.

Arabic presents challenges for AI developers because of its regional dialects, morphological complexity, and the differences between formal written Arabic and everyday speech. Organizations also need models that can work with sector-specific terminology and sensitive data while meeting local requirements for security, privacy, and governance.

HUMAIN’s ALLAM models, developed in collaboration with the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA), are intended to address Arabic-language needs. In August 2026, Microsoft and HUMAIN announced plans to bring ALLAM into Microsoft’s AI ecosystem, potentially giving organizations a more direct route to use the models in enterprise applications. 

In September 2026, HUMAIN also unveiled humain-m3, an Arabic-language model commissioned by HUMAIN and developed by MiniMax. According to the announcement, the model has 428 billion parameters, uses a mixture-of-experts architecture, and was further pre-trained on more than one trillion tokens of Arabic-native content. It entered research preview through HUMAIN Node, the company’s platform for developers, researchers, and enterprises seeking access to AI models and inference capabilities. HUMAIN reported that the model achieved the highest average performance among the frontier models evaluated across seven public Arabic benchmarks. That performance claim is based on the company’s announcement and should be assessed alongside independent evaluations and real-world deployments. 

This illustrates HUMAIN’s hybrid approach: developing local AI capabilities while working with international model developers. The objective is not necessarily to build every component from scratch, but to use partnerships to accelerate development while retaining the ability to customize, deploy, and commercialize AI for Saudi and regional needs.

Another gap concerns the transition from experimentation to routine business use. Companies may have access to AI tools but lack the technical expertise, secure data environments, or internal processes required to deploy them effectively. HUMAIN’s collaboration with Microsoft is designed partly to address this challenge through direct engineering support for organizations identifying and implementing AI use cases. 

Its enterprise operating system, HUMAIN ONE, also reflects a shift toward AI agents: software systems designed to carry out tasks and coordinate workflows rather than simply generate text or answer questions. In May 2026, HUMAIN announced an expanded collaboration with AWS around HUMAIN ONE, aiming to support organizations in building, deploying, and governing autonomous AI agents at scale. 

The commercial test will be whether these products deliver measurable improvements in cost, productivity, service quality, and decision-making. A strong model or platform is not enough on its own; it must solve a problem that customers consider important enough to fund.

Beyond the data center: Physical AI and industrial applications

HUMAIN’s next stage could also involve extending AI from digital services into physical operations. This is important for an economy with substantial activity in energy, logistics, manufacturing, mining, and large infrastructure projects.

On August 31, 2026, HUMAIN and Applied Intuition announced a strategic collaboration to deploy physical AI in Saudi Arabia, beginning with autonomous trucking. The companies said they planned to build a national-scale autonomous logistics network, with thousands of autonomous trucks operating across key Saudi freight corridors by 2030. The partnership could later extend into robotaxis, ports, mining, manufacturing, agriculture, and construction. 

The collaboration links HUMAIN’s AI infrastructure with Applied Intuition’s autonomy technology. Its potential economic impact lies in applications such as increasing fleet utilization, improving freight capacity, reducing operating costs, and supporting logistics networks that can operate more efficiently.

The timeline and scale are ambitious, and the announced target should not be mistaken for an already operational national fleet. Deployment will depend on technical performance, road and logistics infrastructure, safety standards, regulation, and commercial economics.

Still, the move signals that HUMAIN is seeking opportunities where AI can influence physical productivity, not only digital services. If such applications prove commercially viable, they could help connect Saudi AI investment to improvements in existing industries rather than treating AI as a separate technology sector.

What comes after Vision 2030?

HUMAIN’s immediate targets are tied to the period leading up to 2030, but its 6 GW capacity ambition by 2034 points to a strategy extending beyond the Vision 2030 horizon. The company’s longer-term objective appears to be building a Saudi-based AI industry capable of serving customers globally, supported by infrastructure, models, software, and investment. 

For that ambition to become economically sustainable, several priorities will matter.

First, infrastructure must be matched with demand. Data centers are capital-intensive assets, and unused computing capacity can weaken returns. Long-term contracts, diversified customers, and strong utilization rates will be essential to support the expansion.

Second, HUMAIN must turn partnerships into capabilities that can be developed and commercialized locally. International technology providers can accelerate access to chips, models, and software, but the long-term objective should include Saudi expertise in system design, AI engineering, product development, and intellectual property.

Third, the company will need to demonstrate that its AI products can compete on performance, reliability, security, and cost. Arabic-language models and locally hosted infrastructure may provide differentiation, but their value will ultimately depend on the quality of the products and the problems they solve.

Fourth, financing needs to remain aligned with commercial returns. The $1.2 billion Infra framework, the reported $2.5 billion data center fund, and plans for a much larger global venture capital vehicle represent different funding channels and ambitions. They should not be treated as one consolidated investment commitment. HUMAIN has not publicly established a single, fully funded budget covering all its announced capacity targets and investment plans.

Finally, Saudi Arabia will need to deepen its talent base and domestic supply chain. Data centers can be built with international equipment, and models can be developed with global partners, but a competitive AI economy requires engineers, researchers, entrepreneurs, and product teams able to create and improve technology over time.

In a recent interview, Amin described the broader ambition in terms of building an industry from Saudi Arabia rather than merely bringing AI into the country. “Our ambition is not simply to bring AI into Saudi Arabia. It is to build an AI industry from Saudi Arabia that can compete globally,” he said. 

That distinction captures the economic stakes. If HUMAIN succeeds, Saudi Arabia could become more than a market for imported AI products or a location for international data centers. It could develop into a producer and exporter of computing services, Arabic AI models, enterprise applications, and industrial AI solutions.

If the company’s expansion is driven mainly by capacity targets without equivalent progress in customer demand, local capabilities, and commercially successful products, the economic returns could fall short of the investment scale.

The next phase will therefore be measured not only in megawatts and gigawatts, but also in contracted workloads, paying customers, productivity gains, locally developed intellectual property, and technology exports. Those outcomes will determine whether HUMAIN becomes a lasting pillar of Saudi Arabia’s post-2030 economy—or primarily an ambitious infrastructure platform in a rapidly changing global AI market.

Ghada Ismail

Large investment opportunities often require more than capital. They demand industry expertise, strategic insight, and effective risk management. Through a club deal, investors combine resources and experience to pursue opportunities that may be difficult to access individually. This approach is particularly common in private equity and real estate, where high-value transactions often benefit from collaboration.

What Is a Club Deal?

A club deal is an investment transaction in which a group of investors joins forces to finance or acquire an asset, company, or business. Rather than relying on one investor to provide all the necessary capital, participants contribute funds and share the investment according to agreed terms.

Participants may include private equity firms, institutional investors, family offices, and high-net-worth individuals. Beyond capital, they may contribute industry knowledge, management experience, or access to new markets.

Unlike a traditional investment fund, which pools capital to build a portfolio of assets, a club deal typically brings together a select group for a specific transaction.

For example, three private equity firms seeking to acquire a company valued at SAR 1 billion could each contribute part of the purchase price. They would then agree on ownership stakes, decision-making responsibilities, and how future returns would be distributed.

How Does a Club Deal Work?

The process usually begins when an investor identifies an opportunity that requires more capital or expertise than it can provide independently. It then approaches other investors with similar objectives to form a group.

The participants assess the opportunity, conduct due diligence, and negotiate the terms, including each investor's contribution, ownership share, and management responsibilities. They also establish how major decisions will be made, how disputes will be resolved, and what happens if a participant wants to exit.

Once the agreements are finalized, the investors provide the necessary funding and proceed with the transaction. Depending on the structure, they may manage the investment jointly or appoint a team to oversee operations.

Why Do Investors Use Club Deals?

Access to larger opportunities is a major reason why investors would pursue club deals. Pooling capital allows them to participate in transactions that might otherwise exceed their individual investment capacity.

Risk sharing is another advantage, as each participant assumes only part of the financial exposure. However, this does not eliminate the possibility of losses.

Club deals also bring together complementary expertise. One investor may understand a particular industry, while another offers operational experience or knowledge of a specific market. Combining these strengths can improve investment assessment and management.

For private equity firms, this approach can also enable larger acquisitions without concentrating too much capital in a single transaction.

What Are the Risks of a Club Deal?

Despite their advantages, club deals can become complicated when investors have conflicting priorities or management approaches.

Participants may disagree on business strategy, additional funding, the timing of an exit, or whether to sell an asset. Such differences can delay decisions and create tension without clear agreements.

The structure also involves legal negotiations and coordination among multiple parties. Investors must assess their partners' financial capacity, experience, and willingness to cooperate.

Control is another consideration. Smaller investors may have limited influence over major decisions despite committing substantial capital.

Clearly defined ownership rights, voting arrangements, exit provisions, and dispute-resolution mechanisms are therefore essential before a transaction closes.

To Wrap Things Up…

Club deals allow investors to pursue larger opportunities by combining capital, expertise, and market knowledge. However, success depends on more than financial contributions. The quality of the investment, alignment among participants, and clarity of their agreements all play a role. Ultimately, choosing the right partners is just as important as identifying the right opportunity.

Noha Gad

Every product starts as an idea, but turning that idea into a profitable, sustainable offering requires far more than good design or effective marketing. Companies must coordinate research and development (R&D), manufacturing, supply chains, quality control, sales, customer support, and eventual retirement, often across multiple teams, markets, and systems. When this coordination breaks down, it can lead to delayed launches, inconsistent product information, rising costs, compliance risks, and lost customer trust.

This is where Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) becomes essential. PLM is a strategic business approach that manages a product throughout its entire life, from the initial concept and design stages through production, launch, growth, service, and end-of-life. Rather than treating each stage as a separate task handled by a different department, PLM creates a connected framework for managing product data, processes, decisions, and collaboration across the organization.

This approach is not important only for large manufacturers; it is also pivotal to consumer brands, technology companies, industrial firms, and even digital-first businesses that heavily rely on lifecycle management to bring products to market faster, maintain quality, control costs, and respond to changing customer expectations. 

Why does product lifecycle management matter?

At the core of PLM is the end-to-end integration of product data, processes, and systems along the entire value chain. Implementing PLM consistently can shorten decision paths, reduce errors cost, and bring innovations to market faster and more reliably. Increasing product complexity, shorter innovation cycles, and globally distributed value chains make structured PLM a decisive competitive factor that allows companies to manage product processes across departmental and site boundaries, while meeting regulatory, environmental, and economic requirements.

An integrated PLM approach creates the necessary transparency: development, production, quality assurance, sales, and aftersales all work from a shared data foundation. Therefore, decisions become faster, better informed, and more traceable. Also, a consistent, quality-assured product data landscape is a prerequisite for modern technologies such as AI, machine learning, and automation to deliver their full potential.

PLM approach also helps organizations keep up with the evolving complexity and engineering challenges of developing new products. It is one of the four cornerstones of a manufacturing corporation's information technology structure, alongside customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), and enterprise resource planning (ERP). 

For marketing, determining a product’s lifecycle stage guides the team’s strategy. For instance, a new product in the introduction stage needs to be explained, while a mature product needs to be differentiated.

Stages of PLM

PLM follows a structured sequence of phases that guide a product from its earliest idea to its eventual withdrawal from the market. Most PLM frameworks include the following core stages: 

• Concept stage. The concept stage involves initial ideas and planning for a new product, and includes market research, identifying customer needs, and determining the feasibility of the product. Often led by the R&D department, this stage kicks off the product lifecycle, as it is where the ideas are generated.
• Design stage. In this stage, the product is planned, developed, and tested. It involves creating product prototypes, refining the design, and ensuring that it meets all regulatory and safety requirements. 
• Production stage. This stage starts when the company feels confident in the new product and feels there is a market for it. This stage involves manufacturing the product, including sourcing raw materials, assembling components, and testing the final product. At this point, the company should have a fully completed product and should not be continually tweaking the design.
• Sales stage. After the product is made, it moves to the sales stage that involves promoting and selling the product to customers. This includes advertising, sales promotions, and pricing strategies. In many cases, the sales stage and production stage occur concurrently, as a company must try to forecast how many sales will occur.
• Support stage. The support stage involves providing ongoing support to customers after they have purchased the product. This includes customer service, warranties, and repairs. It may also include ongoing training or services provided to new owners to enhance user experience.
• Retirement Stage. Whether competitors have delivered a better product or the product is simply no longer demanded by the market, the product lifecycle ends with the retirement stage. This stage involves the end-of-life of the product, including disposal, recycling, or repurposing of the product.

Finally, product lifecycle management plays a pivotal role in providing companies with a structured approach to manage products from initial idea through design, production, sales, customer support, and retirement. By connecting teams, standardizing product data, and improving collaboration across the value chain, PLM helps businesses launch products faster, reduce errors and costs, maintain quality, and respond more effectively to market changes.

Ghada Ismail

When a company decides to enter a new market or expand its operations, one of the first questions it faces is whether to build from scratch or invest in an existing business or facility. This decision often comes down to two approaches: greenfield investment and brownfield investment.

Both strategies can help companies expand their presence, reach new customers, and increase their market share. However, they differ in how businesses establish operations, how much control they retain, and the costs and risks they take on.

Understanding these differences can help investors choose the approach that best fits their growth plans.

What Is Greenfield Investment?

Greenfield investment occurs when a company establishes a new operation from the ground up in a foreign or domestic market. Instead of purchasing an existing facility or business, the investor develops the project from scratch, which may include acquiring land, constructing buildings, installing equipment, and hiring employees.

One of the main advantages of this approach is control. Investors can design facilities, choose technologies, establish company culture, and structure operations according to their specific requirements.

Greenfield projects can also introduce new technology, create jobs, and support the development of local industries.

However, starting from scratch can be expensive and time-consuming. Investors may need to navigate licensing requirements, secure land, build infrastructure, and establish relationships with suppliers and customers before generating revenue. These challenges can become more significant when entering an unfamiliar market.

What Is Brownfield Investment?

Brownfield investment involves investing in an existing facility, business, or industrial site to expand operations or develop new activities. Depending on the project, investors may renovate an existing property, upgrade production equipment, acquire an operating company, or repurpose an underused industrial site.

This approach can offer a faster route into a market because essential infrastructure may already be available. Existing facilities may have access to utilities, transport networks, suppliers, and an established workforce.

Acquiring an operating business can also provide an existing customer base and established market relationships.

Nevertheless, brownfield investments come with their own challenges. Older facilities may require costly upgrades, while existing businesses can have operational inefficiencies or outdated technology. Investors may also face difficulties integrating employees, systems, and corporate cultures after an acquisition.

Greenfield vs. Brownfield Investment: Key Differences

The main difference lies in how the investment is established.

Initial costs: Greenfield projects typically require substantial upfront spending on land, construction, equipment, and staffing. Brownfield investments may reduce infrastructure costs, although acquisition prices and renovation expenses can be significant.

Time to market: Greenfield investments usually take longer because operations must be developed from the beginning. Brownfield projects can begin operating sooner when the existing infrastructure is suitable.

Control and flexibility: Greenfield investors have greater freedom to design operations and introduce new systems. Brownfield investors may need to adapt existing facilities, processes, or organizational structures.

Risk profile: Greenfield investments carry construction, permitting, and market-entry risks. Brownfield investments involve risks related to existing assets, legacy systems, environmental conditions, and potential hidden liabilities.

Local presence: Greenfield investors build their workforce and business relationships over time. Brownfield investors may benefit from established employees, suppliers, and customers.

Neither strategy is automatically cheaper or safer. The outcome depends on the market, the condition of available assets, and the investor's objectives.

Which Investment Strategy Should Companies Choose?

The right choice depends on what a company wants to achieve.

Greenfield investment may be more suitable for businesses that need specialized facilities, advanced technology, or complete control over their operations. It can also make sense when suitable existing assets are unavailable.

Brownfield investment may appeal to companies seeking faster market entry, existing infrastructure, or an established customer base. It can be particularly attractive when a business can improve an underperforming operation or modernize an outdated facility.

To Wrap Things Up…

Greenfield and brownfield investments offer different routes to business expansion. Greenfield projects provide greater flexibility and control but generally require more time and upfront investment. Brownfield projects can accelerate market entry by building on existing assets, although they may involve costly upgrades and inherited risks.

Ultimately, investors should evaluate total costs, expected returns, operational requirements, and market conditions before committing to either approach. The goal is not simply to build something new or acquire something existing, but to choose the investment structure that offers the strongest long-term value.

Noha Gad

When a company aspires to expand, acquire another business, or finance a major strategic project, traditional sources of funding may not provide the full amount required. Senior lenders may be unwilling to increase their exposure, particularly when the company already has significant debt or lacks sufficient collateral. At the same time, raising additional equity can reduce existing shareholders’ ownership and influence over the business.

Mezzanine financing addresses this gap, as it consists of a hybrid form of capital that combines features of debt and equity and occupies an intermediate position in a company’s capital structure. Companies often use this financing to obtain additional capital beyond the amount available from senior lenders, while limiting the need for a substantial equity raise.

What Is mezzanine financing?

Mezzanine financing represents a strategic financial tool that bridges the gap between senior debt and equity. This hybrid form of financing enables lenders to convert debt into equity, fostering flexibility and higher returns. Frequently employed in acquisitions and company expansions, mezzanine financing captures both opportunity and risk, offering companies crucial capital for growth. Although it is considered one of the highest-risk forms of debt, mezzanine financing offers some of the highest returns in debt investments.

Companies may choose mezzanine financing to fund specific growth projects or acquisitions with short- to medium-term time horizons. Often, these loans will be funded by the company’s long-term investors and existing funders of the company’s capital.

Main forms of mezzanine financing

Mezzanine financing is not a single standardized product. It can be structured in several ways, depending on the company’s financing needs, repayment capacity, capital structure, and the investor’s return requirements. The most common forms include:

• Subordinated debt. This form is a loan that ranks below senior debt in the repayment hierarchy but above equity. If the company defaults or enters liquidation, senior lenders are paid first, while subordinated lenders are repaid only after those obligations have been satisfied.
• Second-lien financing. It is secured by the same assets that support a senior lender’s first lien, but the mezzanine lender has a lower priority claim over those assets. If the borrower defaults, the first-lien lender generally has priority in enforcing its security and recovering the outstanding debt.
• Preferred equity. Preferred equity is legally a form of ownership, but it has features that make it resemble debt or other types of mezzanine capital. Preferred shareholders typically receive priority over common shareholders when dividends are paid, or assets are distributed during a liquidation.

Mezzanine financing provides companies with additional capital and more flexibility than traditional senior debt. Its characteristics make it useful for established businesses pursuing acquisitions, expansion projects, recapitalization, or ownership transitions. Key advantages are:

• Providing access to additional capital by filling the gap between the amount of senior debt a company can obtain and the total capital it needs.
• Helping existing owners retain a larger share of the business than they might retain after a conventional equity raise.
• Offering more flexible repayment structures than conventional bank debt.
• Supporting companies in completing transactions that require more funding than senior debt alone can provide.
• Offering lower cost than pure equity, particularly when the potential cost of giving up a large share of the company’s future value is considered.

Although mezzanine financing can provide flexible capital with less immediate ownership dilution than equity finance, it also exposes the company to higher costs, repayment pressure, and contractual restrictions. These disadvantages mean that it is generally suited to established businesses with predictable cash flows rather than to companies with unstable or insufficient earnings. 

Finally, mezzanine financing is a flexible hybrid capital that can help companies bridge the gap between senior debt and equity. By combining debt-like features with equity-linked characteristics, it enables established businesses to secure additional funding for acquisitions, expansion, recapitalization, and other strategic initiatives while potentially limiting immediate ownership dilution. However, it is generally more expensive than senior debt, may involve equity dilution through conversion rights or warrants, and can put significant pressure on a company’s cash flow because of interest payments and repayment obligations. 

Ghada Ismail

Artificial intelligence may be powered by chips and cloud infrastructure, but the quality of what AI produces increasingly depends on something much less visible: the data used to train it.

Data annotation, the process of labeling, classifying, transcribing, and evaluating data so that AI models can learn from it, is emerging as an important layer of the AI economy. In Saudi Arabia, the opportunity is particularly significant as the Kingdom invests heavily in sovereign AI infrastructure, Arabic-language models and the development of local digital talent.

“The AI race has moved from who has the most data to who has the best data,” said Sayed A., Chief Business Officer at Graystone Capital. “Data annotation is no longer back-office work. It is where model quality is decided.”

The shift is already visible globally. In 2025, Meta invested $14.3 billion for a 49% stake in Scale AI, the data-labeling company founded by Alexandr Wang, valuing the company at more than $29 billion. The deal underscored the growing strategic importance of high-quality training data as major technology companies compete to improve their AI models.

For Saudi Arabia, the opportunity is not simply to provide lower-cost labeling services. It is to build specialized data capabilities around Arabic, Saudi dialects, regulated industries and local cultural context.

From labeling images to training intelligence

At its simplest, annotation means adding information to raw data so an AI system can understand it. An image might be labeled to identify a vehicle or pedestrian. Audio can be transcribed and tagged according to speakers, accents or intent. Text can be classified according to sentiment, subject or meaning.

The role has expanded considerably with generative AI. Human workers can now compare AI-generated answers, identify inaccurate responses, write high-quality examples, assess safety risks, and help models understand specific professional or cultural contexts. This work is often referred to as human feedback, model evaluation, or reinforcement learning from human feedback.

That evolution is changing the value of the industry.

“Leading AI labs have largely used up the easily available text on the internet,” Sayed A. said. “Models now improve mainly through expert human judgment: doctors, lawyers, engineers and finance professionals who can tell a model when its answer is wrong.”

This matters because AI models can produce fluent answers while still making serious mistakes. A general annotator may identify whether an answer is grammatically correct, but a doctor may recognize a dangerous medical recommendation, while a banking professional can identify an incorrect interpretation of a financial rule.

The next generation of annotation businesses is therefore moving beyond volume toward expertise.

Why Saudi Arabia has a data advantage

Saudi Arabia's AI ambitions make this shift particularly relevant.

The Kingdom is building large-scale computing and AI infrastructure through initiatives involving HUMAIN, while the wider GCC is committing billions of dollars to AI infrastructure. Yet computing power alone cannot solve the data problem.

“Compute without quality data is an empty factory,” Sayed A. said.

The challenge is especially clear in Arabic. The language is used daily by more than 400 million people, according to UNESCO, but Arabic represents only 0.6% of websites whose content language is known, according to W3Techs' October 2026 data.

More importantly, Arabic is not a single linguistic market. Models have to deal with Modern Standard Arabic as well as regional varieties, slang, code-switching, and cultural references.

This creates an opening for Saudi companies that can produce data reflecting how people actually speak and communicate in the Kingdom. Sayed A. says: "The Gulf has committed to world-class computing power, from Stargate UAE in Abu Dhabi to HUMAIN in Saudi Arabia. But compute without quality data is an empty factory. Arabic is used daily by more than 400 million people, yet it makes up less than one percent of websites, and it spans more than 30 dialects that standard web data captures poorly. The region's leading models have all had to invest heavily in native, expert-reviewed data. Jais 2 was trained on 600 billion Arabic tokens, and HUMAIN's ALLaM model was refined with more than 600 domain experts and 250 evaluators. Curated Arabic data is a strategic asset, and the GCC is better placed than anyone to build it."

That process illustrates why data quality is becoming a strategic asset rather than a technical afterthought.

A small but growing Saudi startup ecosystem

Saudi Arabia's emerging annotation market includes companies pursuing different parts of the data value chain.

Annota8, a Riyadh-based startup, is developing an annotation platform covering image, video, text, audio and speech, documents and OCR, RAG, and large language model and agent workflows. Its operating layer supports project setup, task assignment, quality review, progress monitoring and data export. The company describes itself as Arabic-first and built in Saudi Arabia. It was also selected for the 500 Global Sanabil Startup Unlocked Program.

Tawsym is a Saudi startup specializing in AI training data and data annotation. Its services cover text, audio, image and video annotation, with a focus on language and cultural characteristics relevant to the Saudi market. The company says it works in partnership with the National Technology Development Program (NTDP) and Monsha'at's AI incubation program, and offers data hosting within Saudi Arabia to meet local data-storage requirements.

Bayanat Labs, based in Riyadh, focuses on Arabic data annotation, collection, alignment and evaluation across text, audio, image, and video. The company uses vetted native speakers, linguists and licensed domain professionals, while offering in-region data hosting by default. Its approach reflects demand for Arabic data that captures local linguistic differences while meeting the data-handling requirements of regulated sectors.

The emergence of these companies comes as Saudi Arabia's broader AI startup ecosystem expands. In June 2026, Monsha'at announced the graduation of 33 AI companies from its first AI incubator cohort, supported through a strategic partnership with the National Technology Development Program.

The gap between AI adoption and AI scale

Demand could increase as Saudi businesses move from experimenting with AI to deploying it across everyday operations.

A 2025 McKinsey survey found that 84% of GCC organizations were using AI in at least one business function, up from 62% in 2023. Yet only 31% had reached a level of AI maturity where AI was being scaled or fully deployed across the organization. That gap is important for data companies.

“GCC companies have embraced AI, but scaling it is another matter,” Sayed A. said. “The gap between pilot and scale is largely a data problem.”

A model that performs well in a demonstration may struggle when exposed to real customer conversations, local terminology, unusual cases or sensitive decisions. Businesses therefore need continuously updated datasets, evaluation systems and human review rather than a one-time training exercise.

This could create recurring demand for Saudi data companies, particularly in sectors where AI is moving into operational decision-making.

Where the biggest opportunities may lie

For Saudi startups, the strongest opportunities are unlikely to come from competing solely on the price of basic labeling.

Specialized Arabic dialects are one area. Saudi speech data, regional expressions, and conversational language are difficult to reproduce through generic global datasets.

Another opportunity is domain-specific annotation. Legal, healthcare, financial, and Islamic finance datasets require people who understand the underlying subject matter, not simply workers following basic labeling instructions.

Sayed A. sees the same potential across the GCC.

“We see a real opening for GCC-based providers of specialized, compliant annotation in areas such as Arabic dialects, Islamic finance, legal and healthcare, where local expertise and in-country data handling are advantages,” he said.

The investment environment is also becoming more supportive. AI startups in MENA raised $858 million in 2025, accounting for 22% of total VC funding in the region, according to MAGNiTT. The UAE and Saudi Arabia together absorbed 87% of AI funding.

For Saudi founders, this creates an opportunity to build an industry that sits underneath the more visible AI applications.

The human side of the AI data economy

Yet the sector faces its own challenges.

Basic labeling is increasingly being automated, putting pressure on companies whose business models depend on simple, repetitive tasks. Global providers also have enormous datasets, established customers, and large workforces.

At the same time, the treatment of annotation workers has become a major issue internationally. Low pay, inconsistent work and weak labor protections can create both ethical and reputational risks.

“The opportunity comes with hurdles,” Sayed A. said. “Automation is steadily commoditizing basic labelling, and global players are already setting up in the Gulf.”

That makes quality and trust increasingly important. Companies handling medical records, banking information or government datasets need strong controls around privacy, security, access and provenance.

Saudi Arabia’s focus on developing AI talent could provide another advantage. Under its National Strategy for Data and Artificial Intelligence, the Kingdom aims to develop 20,000 data and AI specialists and experts by 2030. Annotation could provide one route into that ecosystem, particularly as the work expands from basic labeling toward linguistics, quality assurance, model evaluation, red teaming and domain expertise.

From data labeling to strategic infrastructure

The biggest change may therefore be in how annotation itself is perceived.

What began as a labor-intensive task sitting behind the AI industry is becoming part of the model-development stack. The best providers are no longer simply asking people to label thousands of images or text samples. They are building systems for collecting, validating, evaluating, and governing the data that AI systems depend on.

For Saudi Arabia, that distinction matters.

The Kingdom has already invested heavily in computing capacity, AI models and digital infrastructure. The next layer is the human infrastructure that makes those systems useful in the local market.

“The winners will compete on expertise and trust, not on the lowest price per label,” Sayed A. said.

That may ultimately be the most important opportunity for Saudi Arabia's data annotation startups. Rather than becoming another low-cost outsourcing market, the Kingdom can build a specialized data industry around something global AI systems increasingly need but cannot easily manufacture themselves: high-quality human expertise rooted in the language, industries and culture of the region.

Ghada Ismail

In the final part of our interview, Abu Zannad turns to Saudi startups with international ambitions and closes with the one piece of advertising history he’d want every founder to know before they spend their first marketing riyal.

As Saudi startups look to expand internationally, how important is it to adapt their brand and messaging to different markets without losing their original identity?

“I think the wrong question for a Saudi startup is: “How much of our Saudi identity should we keep when we go abroad?”

The more useful question is: “What did being built in Saudi Arabia teach us that could make us more valuable somewhere else?”

Because origin by itself is not a strategy. It is raw material for a strategy.

And I think Saudi startups should be increasingly confident about this. The ecosystem has changed enormously. Saudi Arabia recorded $1.72 billion in venture-capital investment across 257 deals in 2025, the highest levels the market has seen. We are no longer only asking whether globally competitive startups can be created in Saudi Arabia. Increasingly, we are asking which of them can travel.

But travelling does not mean becoming culturally anonymous. The strongest global brands rarely erase where they came from. They understand what should travel intact and what needs to be translated.

I would ask a Saudi founder to think about four things.

First:

What is your Saudi core?

Not the flag. Not Arabic typography. Not putting a palm tree into the identity.

What capability, insight or sensibility did growing up inside this market actually give you?

Maybe you learned to design technology for Arabic-speaking consumers rather than adapting English technology afterwards. Maybe you became unusually good at operating in regulated and fragmented environments. Maybe your understanding of hospitality produced a different service standard. Maybe you grew up around a culture of family commerce and understood social selling differently. Maybe rapid transformation in the Kingdom taught your company to operate at a pace and scale that companies from more settled markets are not accustomed to. Maybe there is something in Saudi food, design, beauty, gaming, tourism, fintech or culture that the rest of the world has not encountered in this form before.

But the discipline is important:

Don’t ask what is Saudi about us. Ask 1-what is uniquely Saudi about us that is useful to somebody else.

Unifonic is an interesting example. It began in Saudi Arabia solving the difficult reality of reliable communications in fragmented, regulated markets and across Arabic language environments. Today it describes cultural fluency, trust and AI-native customer experience as part of its proposition. Something learned locally became a capability that could travel.

Foodics is another Saudi-born company that took its restaurant technology beyond the Kingdom into markets including the UAE and Egypt. The transferable asset was not “Saudi-ness” as decoration. It was a solution developed inside a sophisticated regional F&B environment that was relevant to restaurant operators elsewhere.

That brings me to the second question: 2-What are the qualifying factors in the market you are entering?

Strategists sometimes call these points of parity.

These are the things you have to get right simply to be taken seriously. If I enter Germany, Singapore, the UAE or Britain, what does the category expect? What is the regulatory standard? What does good customer service mean? What payment behaviour exists? What is the expected delivery time? What does trust look like? Which features are simply assumed? What tone belongs on the platform? What does the audience consider credible?

These are not necessarily reasons someone will choose you. They are the price of admission. A Saudi fintech company cannot enter another market saying, “We are proudly Saudi,” while failing to understand its financial regulation. A consumer startup cannot insist that its Saudi customer journey must be reproduced exactly in London.

Identity is not an excuse for irrelevance. You earn the right to be different only after you have demonstrated that you belong in the category.

Then comes the third question: 3-What are your winning factors?

These are your points of difference. Once I believe you can perform the basic job as well as the alternatives, why should I choose you? This is where Saudi origin can become strategically interesting. What can you offer that the incumbent cannot easily copy? A product insight? A technology? A cultural understanding? A design sensibility? A service model? A community? A particular form of hospitality? Access to a new cultural world? A way of solving complexity that your home market forced you to learn?

So I would separate very clearly:

Qualifying factors get you into the consideration set.
Winning factors give people a reason to choose you.

And both have to be understood at several levels: the market, the category, the audience, and increasingly, the platform.

Something that makes you distinctive on TikTok may be irrelevant in enterprise sales. Something that wins in Saudi food culture may need a different cultural translation in Paris. Something that works in B2C may signal the wrong things entirely in B2B.

So the identity stays coherent. The expression adapts.

This is where I think the national Saudi Made brand offers a very useful lesson. The program was deliberately created as a unified identity for Saudi products and services in domestic and international markets, and from the beginning it has been associated with quality, competitiveness, credibility and excellence. More recently that architecture has expanded: there is a Saudi Tech label supporting technology companies abroad, while the Saudi Crafts identity has been explicitly built around creativity, authenticity and quality presented in a contemporary way.

I find that combination interesting.

Quality and innovation on one side.
Authenticity and cultural confidence on the other.

Saudi Arabia does not have to choose between heritage and modernity. In many ways, the interesting story of Saudi Arabia today is precisely the tension between the two. That is something Saudi startups can borrow from; not necessarily the Saudi Made logo itself, because that has eligibility requirements, but the larger idea of what Saudi provenance can begin to mean.

A Saudi startup going abroad should ask:

4-What does “from Saudi Arabia” add to this particular proposition?

Sometimes the answer may be heritage. Sometimes technology. Sometimes design. Sometimes hospitality. Sometimes ambition. Sometimes the credibility of having solved a difficult problem in one of the world’s fastest-transforming economies. And sometimes, frankly, Saudi origin may add nothing relevant to the customer’s decision. Then don’t force it.

Because the objective is not to make every international customer admire where you come from. The objective is to give them a compelling reason to choose what you built. That is why I would never tell Saudi founders simply to “localize.” Localization can become another superficial exercise: change the language, hire a local influencer, swap some images and call the job finished.

I prefer the word trans-creation.

Trans-creation asks a much harder question:

5-How can the same meaning survive in a different cultural grammar?

This is actually one of the larger ideas behind AdEntity. Cultures have always survived contact not by remaining untouched, but by absorbing and translating what comes from outside while retaining enough coherence to remain recognizable.

Brands are not very different. The identity should have a centre. The expression should have flexibility. So if I had to give Saudi startups one framework for international expansion, it would be:

Know what is non-negotiably yours.
Learn what is non-negotiably theirs.
Meet the qualifying factors.
Protect the winning factors.
Then translate the expression for the market, category, audience and platform.

Don’t export the Saudi advertisement. Export the Saudi advantage. And perhaps the strongest global Saudi brands of the future will not be the ones that become less Saudi as they travel. They will be the ones that discover which part of being Saudi the world finds valuable.”

If you were advising a founder launching a startup today, what is one lesson from the history of advertising that you would want them to understand before spending their first marketing budget?

“My first advice? Please refer to my previous six answers. But if I had to reduce 100 years of advertising history to one lesson, it would be this:

Media amplifies.

It does not create meaning.

If you haven’t understood the human, the culture, the category, the product truth, and why anybody should care, spending more money will not solve the problem. Today, AI can simply help you waste that money faster.

So before buying attention, build something worth paying attention to. Then amplify the hell out of it.”

Noha Gad

Riyadh is rapidly emerging as a global hub for artificial intelligence (AI), driven by Saudi Vision 2030, massive investments, and a coordinated national strategy led by the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA). Designating 2026 as the “Year of AI” and committing over $14.9 billion in AI-related investments, the Kingdom is moving from strategy to execution, building one of the region’s most advanced digital infrastructures. With over 60 data centers, the world’s largest government data facility (Hexagon), and strategic partnerships with global tech giants, the Saudi capital now offers the infrastructure, capital, and talent pipeline needed to develop, deploy, and scale AI at pace. Additionally, initiatives such as the Riyadh Digital Innovation District, the national AI management standard (ISO 42001), and large-scale training programs signal a broader ambition: to make Riyadh a top-10 global technology district and a responsible, innovation-driven AI ecosystem by 2030.

Future-ready AI infrastructure

Riyadh’s emergence as an AI hub is underpinned by a rapidly expanding digital infrastructure designed to support the intensive computing, storage, and connectivity requirements of advanced AI systems. This infrastructure combines high-performance computing, large-scale data centers, cloud services, and specialized AI development zones, creating an integrated foundation for research, government applications, and private-sector innovation.

A key component is Shaheen III, the most powerful supercomputer in the GCC, operated by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). Consisting of two partitions: a CPU partition and a GPU-accelerated partition, Shaheen III is the fastest supercomputer in the Middle East and ranked among the world’s leading high-performance computers. Alongside it, the Hexagon Data Center in Riyadh is classified as the world’s largest government data center with a Tier IV facility and a planned capacity of 480 megawatts. Spanning over 30 million square feet in the Saudi Capital, Hexagon Data Center meets the highest international standards, aiming to ensure maximum levels of availability, security, and operational readiness for government data centers.

The Kingdom has also established nine cloud regions, in partnership with global tech leaders:

1. Google Cloud’s region in Dammam. Launched in November 2023, this region is Google’s official cloud hub in Saudi Arabia, obtaining a Class C License from the Communications, Space and Technology Commission (CST) and supported by $1 billion in strategic cloud and AI infrastructure investments by Google. 
2. Oracle (three cloud regions in Riyadh, Jeddah, and NEOM). Oracle launched its first Oracle Cloud Region in Jeddah in 2020 to provide over 100 core cloud and AI services, including Oracle Autonomous Database, OCI Compute, and enterprise SaaS apps. In October 2021, the company announced its partnership with NEOM Tech and Digital Hold Company to establish a hyperscale data center in NEOM to serve the ambitions of the public and private sector across the region and beyond. To further strengthen its commitment to the Kingdom, the tech giant launched a new cloud region in Riyadh in August 2024 to help businesses increase performance, protect data, and access Oracle's full array of cloud services. 
3. Huawei. Launched in 2023, the Huawei Cloud Riyadh Region is the company’s first region in the Middle East, offering three availability zones to promote digital-led economic growth in the Kingdom.
4. Alibaba. Launched in 2022, Alibaba launched its Cloud Region in Riyadh with two availability zones operated by the Saudi Cloud Computing Company (SCCC).
5. Tencent. Tencent Cloud launched its first Middle East Cloud Region in Riyadh in 2025, featuring two availability zones with full redundancy, advanced cloud services, and AI capabilities.
6. AWS. In 2024, Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced its plans to build three cloud regions in Saudi Arabia, including an AI Zone in collaboration with HUMAIN.
7. Microsoft Azure. Set to be launched in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2026, Microsoft's Saudi Arabia East Azure datacenter region will enable government and private sector organizations to access supported Microsoft cloud and AI services and host eligible workloads and data locally in the Kingdom.

Together, these projects demonstrate Riyadh’s ambition to move beyond adopting AI technologies and become a major location for developing, hosting, and scaling them.

Key events powering Riyadh’s AI ecosystem

Riyadh’s AI ambitions are reinforced by a growing network of partnerships with global technology companies, the establishment of regional headquarters (RHQs), and the organization of major international technology and entrepreneurship events. These efforts are helping the city attract investment, expand access to cloud and computing infrastructure, develop local talent, and connect Saudi startups with global investors and technology leaders.

Major tech companies moved their regional headquarters to Riyadh to better serve the broader Middle East region. For instance, Lenovo opened its Middle East, Turkey, and Africa (META) RHQ in Riyadh this year, placing Saudi Arabia at the center of its regional leadership and supporting customers and partners across more than 60 countries. Similarly, other tech giants, including Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, Groq, and Tencent Cloud, announced strategic investments and initiatives to enhance AI, cloud computing, data centers, and skills development. 

The Kingdom is also strengthening its AI ecosystem by hosting and organizing flagship events and exhibitions that provide spaces for companies, policymakers, researchers, investors, and startups to exchange knowledge, announce partnerships, showcase emerging solutions, and reinforce Riyadh’s position as a meeting point for the global AI industry. Some of these leading events are:

• LEAP, the massive annual global technology event held in Riyadh, focusing on major tracks, notably AI, fintech, and cybersecurity.
• Black Hat, the leading cybersecurity conference and exhibition that gathers cybersecurity professionals, cutting-edge technologies, solution providers, and decision-makers from around the world. Black Hat MEA 2026 is scheduled to take place in Riyadh from 1 to 3 December.
•  Middle East Entrepreneurship AI & Analytics Summit, a global gathering for senior government, enterprise, and technology leaders to explore the technologies, strategies, and use cases shaping Saudi Arabia’s AI-powered future. The 15^th edition of the ME Entrepreneurship AI & Analytics Summit will convene in the Saudi capital on 28 October.
• NextGen2030 2.0 Youth & AI Summit Riyadh 2026, the international youth summit bringing together young leaders, innovators, entrepreneurs, and changemakers from around the world to explore the future of AI, youth leadership, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
• Global AI Show, Saudi Arabia’s biggest AI conference where the next generation of AI innovation meets real business opportunity.

Upskilling national AI talent

A sustainable AI hub needs more than investment; it needs people. That is why Saudi Arabia is focusing on developing local AI talent, improving digital skills, and preparing the workforce for AI-driven business environments. SDAIA is leading these efforts by launching major initiatives, notably the SDAIA Academy, which provides professional programs and practical bootcamps in areas such as machine learning (ML), large language models (LLMs), data engineering, computer vision, generative AI, AI-agent development, and responsible AI.

Global tech companies entering the Saudi market are also contributing to upskilling Saudi national talent in AI and other emerging technologies by transferring technical knowledge, delivering specialized training, and creating practical pathways for Saudi professionals to gain experience with widely used industry tools. For instance, Salesforce pledged to provide upskilling opportunities to 30,000 Saudi citizens by 2030 through its AI Center of Excellence (CoE) in Riyadh. Similarly, AWS partnered with the Saudi Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MCIT) on a national program designed to qualify more than 20,000 Saudi citizens in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and cloud computing.

AWS also launched the AWS Builder Accelerator to provide Saudi graduates and early-career technology professionals with intensive training in cloud computing and AWS technologies. Additionally, Google’s Gemini unveiled an initiative to give one million students at Saudi universities access to advanced AI technologies, helping them develop digital skills and prepare for future jobs.

Meanwhile, Microsoft’s joint training programs have benefited more than one million beneficiaries over the past years. This included training over two-thirds of a million participants in SDAIA’s SAMAI initiative, empowering over 5,000 women through specialized programs, and training thousands of students and over 100,000 teachers.

Finally, Riyadh’s emergence as a global AI hub is being built on more than ambitious targets. Through large-scale computing and cloud infrastructure, partnerships with global technology companies, international events, and broad-based skills development, the Saudi capital is creating an ecosystem capable of turning AI investment into practical economic and social value. As the city continues to attract tech giants, develop local expertise, and expand its capacity to host and deploy advanced AI systems, its role in the global technology landscape is likely to become increasingly significant. 

Ghada Ismail

When a company wants to grow, buying another business can sometimes be easier than building something from scratch. Instead of spending years developing a new product, entering a new market, or hiring a specialized team, a company can acquire a smaller business that already has what it needs.

This is the idea behind a bolt-on acquisition.

A bolt-on acquisition is when an established company buys a smaller business and adds it to its existing operations. The acquired company usually brings something specific to the table, such as new technology, customers, talent, products, or access to a particular market.

The focus is not necessarily on changing the entire business. It is about adding another useful piece to what is already there.

How does a bolt-on acquisition work?

It usually starts with a company identifying an area where it wants to grow.

Take a software company that has a large customer base but does not offer cybersecurity services. Rather than spending years developing those services internally, it could acquire a smaller cybersecurity company that already has the technology, employees, and customers.

The buyer can then add those capabilities to its existing business.

The acquired company may keep its own name and management team, or it may be fully integrated into the larger company. That depends on the businesses involved and what the buyer believes will work best.

What matters is that the acquisition fills a specific gap or creates an opportunity for further growth.

Why do companies choose bolt-on acquisitions?

Speed is one of the biggest reasons. Building a new product or entering a new market takes time. Companies need to hire people, develop products, find customers, and build relationships. Buying an established business can shorten that process considerably.

Bolt-ons can also give companies access to new markets. A business looking to expand into another country, for example, could acquire a local company that already understands the market and has an established customer base.

Technology and talent are another major attraction. In areas such as artificial intelligence, fintech, and software, smaller companies often develop highly specialized products or expertise that larger businesses may want to bring in quickly.

There can also be financial benefits. Once the businesses are combined, the buyer may be able to share infrastructure, eliminate overlapping costs, and introduce the acquired company's products to a much larger customer base.

How is it different from a major acquisition?

Not every acquisition is a bolt-on.

A large or transformational acquisition can significantly change the direction of a company. It could involve buying a major competitor, entering a completely new industry, or acquiring a business that becomes a central part of the company's future.

A bolt-on is usually more focused.

The buyer already has an established business and is looking for smaller companies that can strengthen it in specific areas. In simple terms, it is less about rebuilding the business and more about adding to it.

That can make bolt-ons easier to manage than very large deals, although integration still requires careful planning.

What is the challenging part here?

Smaller acquisitions are not automatically easy acquisitions.

One of the biggest challenges is making the two businesses work together. Different company cultures, technology systems, and ways of working can create problems if they are not handled properly.

There is also the question of price. A company may look like a perfect fit, but if the buyer pays too much, the deal may not generate the expected returns.

Then there are the promised synergies. Buyers often expect an acquisition to increase sales or reduce costs, but those benefits do not happen automatically. They need to be planned and executed.

To Wrap Things Up…

For companies with ambitious growth plans, bolt-on acquisitions can offer a practical way to expand without making one huge bet. Instead of spending a large amount on a single transformational deal, a company can make several smaller acquisitions over time. Each one can add something different, whether that is technology, customers, talent or geographic reach.

This approach is particularly common among private equity-backed companies. An investor may acquire a larger “platform” business and then use a series of bolt-on acquisitions to expand it.

Ultimately, a successful bolt-on acquisition comes down to one simple question: Does the smaller company add something the buyer genuinely needs?

If the answer is yes, and the two businesses can work well together, a bolt-on can be a relatively straightforward way to accelerate growth without starting from zero.

Ghada Ismail

Not every good startup is a venture capital startup.

That can be hard for founders to hear, especially when they have built a product people like, attracted their first customers, and started generating revenue. But venture capital is not simply looking for businesses that work. It is looking for businesses that could become much, much bigger.

That is what makes a startup “VC-backable.” It is less about having a well-prepared investor presentation and more about showing investors that there is a real opportunity to build something with significant scale.

Market Size and Growth Potential

One of the first questions investors will ask is how big the opportunity really is.

A startup can solve a genuine problem and still have limited room to grow if its potential customer base is too small. For a VC-backed company, the ambition usually needs to go beyond building a profitable small business.

This is particularly relevant for startups in Saudi Arabia and the wider GCC. A founder may begin with a solution designed for Saudi customers, but investors will want to understand whether that business can eventually expand across the region or into other markets.

The bigger question is not just, “Who will buy this?” It is, “How many people or businesses could eventually need it?”

Customer Demand and Market Traction

A great idea is still only an idea until someone is willing to use it or pay for it.

This is where traction matters. Revenue, customer numbers, repeat purchases, retention, and transaction volumes can all show whether a startup is gaining genuine momentum.

For an early-stage company, traction does not necessarily mean millions in revenue. A growing user base, successful pilots, strong engagement or commercial partnerships can also demonstrate demand.

But there is a difference between growth and meaningful growth. Adding customers through heavy discounts, for example, does not necessarily prove that they will stay.

The Problem and the Value Proposition

The strongest startups tend to begin with a problem rather than technology for technology’s sake.

If a company can help businesses reduce costs, make a complicated process faster, improve access to finance, or solve a problem customers face regularly, its value becomes easier to understand.

Saudi Arabia’s rapidly developing fintech, healthcare, logistics, and technology sectors offer plenty of opportunities. The challenge is proving that the solution is valuable enough for customers to change their existing habits.

Founder Experience and Execution

Investors are putting money into a company, but they are also betting on the people running it.

Founders do not necessarily need decades of experience or impressive corporate backgrounds. What matters is whether they understand the problem, know their customers, and can keep adapting when things do not go according to plan.

Startups rarely follow the original business plan perfectly. Markets change, products need to be rebuilt, and early assumptions can prove wrong. Being able to respond to those changes can be just as important as having the original idea.

Scalability and Business Economics

Rapid growth sounds impressive until you look at how much it costs.

Investors will want to understand how much it costs to acquire a customer, how long that customer stays, and how much value they generate. A startup does not need perfect economics from day one, but there should be a credible path toward becoming more efficient as it grows.

That is also where scalability comes in. A Saudi startup might expand from one city to the wider Kingdom, then into the GCC or other international markets. The opportunity does not have to be global from day one, but investors will want to see what the next stages could look like.

Ultimately, being VC-backable does not mean a startup has to be perfect. Very few early-stage companies are.

It means giving investors a reason to believe the business can become significantly larger than it is today, and that the founders have a realistic way of getting there.

Ghada Ismail

Some investment funds just die quietly. They stop making new deals, their investment period comes to an end, and investors expect their money to be returned. But sometimes, the fund does not quite disappear. It keeps holding companies, waiting for the right moment to sell, while years continue to pass.

This is where the term “zombie fund” comes in.

A zombie fund is generally a private equity, venture capital, or similar investment fund that has reached or passed the end of its intended investment period but continues to exist because it still holds investments that have not been sold or exited. Instead of raising new capital and actively building a portfolio, the fund manager mainly focuses on managing existing assets and eventually returning whatever value can be recovered to investors.

Why Are Zombie Funds Created?

Most private investment funds operate on a defined timeline. A typical fund may spend its first few years identifying and investing in companies before entering a later period focused on managing and exiting those investments.

The problem begins when some portfolio companies cannot be sold within the expected timeframe.

For example, a private equity fund may have invested in a company expecting to sell it after several years. If market conditions deteriorate, valuations fall, or the company struggles to find a buyer, selling the investment may no longer make financial sense. The fund may therefore extend its holding period.

If this happens across several investments, the fund can remain active long after its original investment strategy has effectively ended.

How Does a Zombie Fund Work?

A zombie fund typically does not have the same level of activity as a new or actively investing fund. Its manager is primarily concerned with overseeing existing portfolio companies, making necessary decisions, and looking for opportunities to exit those investments.

The fund may still generate returns for investors, but capital is generally being returned gradually rather than being deployed into a new generation of investments.

For fund managers, this can create a difficult situation. Managing an older portfolio requires time and resources, while the management fees generated by the remaining assets may become less attractive as the fund shrinks.

For investors, meanwhile, capital can remain tied up for longer than originally expected.

Why Do Zombie Funds Matter?

Zombie funds can become particularly important during periods of weak investment activity or challenging exit markets.

When valuations decline or buyers become more cautious, private-market investors may struggle to sell portfolio companies at attractive prices. Rather than accepting a significant loss, a fund manager may decide to wait for market conditions to improve.

This can protect the potential value of an investment, but it can also delay the return of capital to investors.

A large number of aging funds can also affect the broader private equity ecosystem. Capital that remains locked in older investments cannot easily be recycled into new opportunities. This may reduce the ability of investors to commit capital to emerging companies and new fund managers.

Wrapping Things Up…

A zombie fund sits in an unusual space between life and closure. It is still legally and financially active, but its original investment mission has largely run its course.

For investors, understanding zombie funds is important because they highlight one of the less visible realities of private markets: investing does not end when the money is deployed. Exits, valuations, market conditions, and the timing of returns can keep capital tied up for years beyond expectations.

Ultimately, a zombie fund is not defined simply by its age. It is defined by what happens after its active investment life is supposed to have ended. In a market where patience can sometimes unlock value, staying alive may be strategic. But when there is no clear path to an exit or value creation, the same longevity can become a burden.